|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: [510] days from disposing of Labour. BNFL are shit. One repossession, one (bank) window.
Posts: 8,241
|
Some serious modifications in progress (600WHP, transmission upgrade)
HKS GT570 @ 17psi - 600+WHP
![]() Quote:
Last edited by R33_GTS-t; 13th September 2008 at 10:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 603
|
here is the scoop on the transmission
CBA-R35: First GT-R transmission and differential development Upgrades! but that dyno is not from the same compainy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: [510] days from disposing of Labour. BNFL are shit. One repossession, one (bank) window.
Posts: 8,241
|
I wonder how successful they'll be with the clutch packs. An upgrade can't be that easy. With a normal transmission, stock clutches are compromised to offer smoother changes. With DCT, the change is set to occur almost instantaneously anyway. If strengthening it was so easy, wouldn't it already be that way as stock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
Maybe the gearbox is not strong enough to cope with much higher torque outputs and so Nissan made the clutch so that it slips before the gearbox gets too stressed. Only time and tuning will tell how much the box can cope with once strengthened clutch packs are out there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
|
I'm not so sure - seeing how close Nissan have worked with the Japanese government to ensure their cars are strictly road legal, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that they intentionally didn't over-engineer components as they did with the RB line.
__________________
Forum Webmaster Relaunched and back with verve blowdog.com | musings of a 35 year young child. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Registered user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: with mom or in the garden
Posts: 5,092
|
Quote:
That has now changed and the government allows anything now. So no need for overengineering for now, as the GTR and the IS-F can be considered overengineered, as they simply exceed 280HP. Then the new j-customers are very different from old times, the maniacs obsessed to tune cars are long gone and most young people don't care about sports cars anymore today. So the new customers will enjoy the new expensive sports cars the way they are, they want a car that is not related to the tuning maniac scene. That's probably why cars won't be overengineered in future in japan (but still being state of the art , bringing high end techology for the bargain) When I look at this thread I feel like looking at a Ferrari thread, where you try to modify a bloody expensive part and which at the end only ultra rich peeps can afford to do. It's an other world! Last edited by gtrlux; 15th September 2008 at 02:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 27
|
First, I have to start by saying that I enjoy reading your blog for its up to the minute breaking updates. But could you please either use a dictionary function or a spell checker? The grammar and typos in the blog make me cringe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 603
|
yes, me too. i agree... but i dont have the time to bother. i find something i post it and i go do personal things in my life. sorry
i do care, and want to make it better, but just dont have the time to make it my job ![]() wish i had more time to do more. and i really appreciate the good comments. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|