Shaftless throttles for RB26DETT - Page 2 - GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum

Want to buy a banner ad? Find out more here.

Go Back   GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum > General > Nissan Skylines including R32, R33, R34 and others > Engine Mods



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 26th October 2008, 01:06 PM   #16 (permalink)
Cris is slightly rippled with a flat underside
GTROC Member
 
Cris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sussex
Cars owned: BNR32, RGV, Runner
Posts: 1,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by goddard View Post
Slide throttles are notoriously difficult to get to seal and to move when under pressure, and can stick alot. Roller barrel throttles are great at full throttle, but rubbish at everything else (similar for sliders). There is a reason why everyone uses butterflies. These are just butterflies, but a little better
This is a question I've been asking myself for a while. Whilst wondering through the Ferrari Galleria I was having a look at some of the old F1 engines they had on stands. Several from the early 90s had flatslides and the later engines went back to butterflys. My assumption was that the butterflys gave better response.

None the less this idea looks good. Seems like a far better idea than a big single TB.
__________________
Cris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008, 01:43 PM   #17 (permalink)
Nocturnal has no status.
New Users
 
Nocturnal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Banzai Oct.07 Issue
Cars owned: Widebody BNR32
Posts: 1,975
That sounds interesting, keep us updated.
__________________
Nocturnal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008, 01:50 PM   #18 (permalink)
andy@amt has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chesterfield
Posts: 197
All i can say with out giving away secrets is that on the flow bench the standard
butterflies are very restrictive. We have taken out the shaft and just had the butterfly in and gained a very small percentage of flow, we have also bored the throttle body out to 50mm and also gained a very small percentage. The most flow was gained taking out the butterfly and the spindle altogether, the conclusion I came to was that the transition of the port shape to the round butterfly was limiting the flow. Most flow was gained with a single throttle body plenum but we also found this was critical to gain equal flow to cylinders 1 & 6 when off boost. However by angling the throttle body you could also balance out the flow on 1 & 6 but obviously you are governed by space in the engine bay to carry this out.

thanks
andy@amt
__________________
andy@amt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008, 03:43 PM   #19 (permalink)
goddard has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
goddard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naaaaaaaarrrrwich
Cars owned: R34 Nismo GTT
Posts: 61
Andy, you have PM
__________________
goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008, 06:24 PM   #20 (permalink)
makenski is makenski
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy@amt View Post
All i can say with out giving away secrets is that on the flow bench the standard
butterflies are very restrictive. We have taken out the shaft and just had the butterfly in and gained a very small percentage of flow, we have also bored the throttle body out to 50mm and also gained a very small percentage. The most flow was gained taking out the butterfly and the spindle altogether, the conclusion I came to was that the transition of the port shape to the round butterfly was limiting the flow. Most flow was gained with a single throttle body plenum but we also found this was critical to gain equal flow to cylinders 1 & 6 when off boost. However by angling the throttle body you could also balance out the flow on 1 & 6 but obviously you are governed by space in the engine bay to carry this out.

thanks
andy@amt
Just curious what are you measuring the flow of?
__________________
makenski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 10:07 AM   #21 (permalink)
Chris Wilson has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Shropshire
Cars owned: 2 x Zeus sports GT race cars, Lola F3000 Mugen, R33 GTS-t with RB26 engine, knackered Daewoo Matiz :)
Posts: 2,123
Why not roller barrel bodies? The downside of shaftless butterflies is if a back fire occurs, they are easily bent. That aside, does your company offer a plenum for twin DCOE style throttle bodies capable of taking positive pressure, and with trumpets within to stabilise air flow? Thanks.
__________________
Chris Wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 06:52 PM   #22 (permalink)
goddard has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
goddard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naaaaaaaarrrrwich
Cars owned: R34 Nismo GTT
Posts: 61
These butterfly's are stainless steel. You could try bending it, but I don't think you'd get very far!

Roller barrels very big and heavy for the size of throttle you get, plus the only work on full throttle. These designs can be within 0.5% of having nothing there at all. Not much of a benefit going to a roller/slider throttle when you start to list the faults with those systems.

At the moment I have only seen filters, the body, runner and trumpet itself are all machined a to good fit so should take some positive pressure without any seals or gaskets. The guy at Active did want to know if people would be interested in a carbon plenum to go with the throttles. I'm gonna start some work on this tomorrow I think, it may turn into a series of options you could buy from direct replacement, to new direct to head throttles with profiled butterflies to match the ports and a much improved blend into runner/trumpet along with a new plenum. Obviously it depends on requests from people and subsequent testing of prototypes.

I'll be in touch when I have some initial concepts and prices for you.
__________________
goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 07:07 PM   #23 (permalink)
Stachi is has was has been thinking what to put here.. and still doesn't know it..
GTROC Member
 
Stachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Heilbronn, Germany - Kraut and Proud :)
Cars owned: QM1 R33 GTR
Posts: 1,334
Send a message via ICQ to Stachi Send a message via MSN to Stachi
Tell'em to manufacture them! Would be a very nice feature, they look cool. I don't care about power increase What Control are they using? My bet's on Fanuc.

Marc
__________________
---
Stachi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 07:16 PM   #24 (permalink)
goddard has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
goddard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naaaaaaaarrrrwich
Cars owned: R34 Nismo GTT
Posts: 61
AT don't have any CNC machines themselves, but the company where I am based (TML Precision Engineering) make some of their stuff. Depends on what machine. Alot are Fanuc yeah Latest machine is a Mazak Integrex 200 Mk2 SY (sub spindle, Y axis driven tooling etc) with Mazatrol though - can make turbines, which is cool.
__________________
goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 07:19 PM   #25 (permalink)
Stachi is has was has been thinking what to put here.. and still doesn't know it..
GTROC Member
 
Stachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Heilbronn, Germany - Kraut and Proud :)
Cars owned: QM1 R33 GTR
Posts: 1,334
Send a message via ICQ to Stachi Send a message via MSN to Stachi
Offtopic but.. I like the Mazatrol alot! I have been working on Super QuickTurns, Super Quadrex, Variaxis..

Looking forward for those items Look really nice!

Marc
__________________
---
Stachi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 07:36 PM   #26 (permalink)
tarmac terror is building a track car
New Users
 
tarmac terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hampshire, but Scottish through and through!
Cars owned: R32 GTR; E46 M3
Posts: 3,223
Send a message via MSN to tarmac terror
Original TB's have that wierd rubber type seal around the inner part of the tract that sees so many folks have idle problems after they remove it. Any info on how that will be addressed??

TT
__________________
tarmac terror is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 08:04 PM   #27 (permalink)
Chris Wilson has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Shropshire
Cars owned: 2 x Zeus sports GT race cars, Lola F3000 Mugen, R33 GTS-t with RB26 engine, knackered Daewoo Matiz :)
Posts: 2,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarmac terror View Post
Original TB's have that wierd rubber type seal around the inner part of the tract that sees so many folks have idle problems after they remove it. Any info on how that will be addressed??

TT

What seal is this? Not sure what you mean there, can you tell me more please?
__________________
Chris Wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 08:54 PM   #28 (permalink)
tarmac terror is building a track car
New Users
 
tarmac terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hampshire, but Scottish through and through!
Cars owned: R32 GTR; E46 M3
Posts: 3,223
Send a message via MSN to tarmac terror
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Wilson View Post
What seal is this? Not sure what you mean there, can you tell me more please?
Inside the barrel of the TB's there is a rubber type seal that the butterflies rest on when closed. I have read stories on here of folks who have 'cleaned' there TB's and removed this only to find that their idle is crap.

TT
__________________
tarmac terror is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 09:03 PM   #29 (permalink)
Chris Wilson has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Shropshire
Cars owned: 2 x Zeus sports GT race cars, Lola F3000 Mugen, R33 GTS-t with RB26 engine, knackered Daewoo Matiz :)
Posts: 2,123
I have just looked at 2 sets of stock TB's and can see nothing like that, the idle ("closed") position seems solely controlled by the adjustable external stop screws and lock nuts. Anyone got a pic of these things please?
__________________
Chris Wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008, 10:22 PM   #30 (permalink)
goddard has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
goddard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naaaaaaaarrrrwich
Cars owned: R34 Nismo GTT
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Wilson View Post
Anyone got a pic of these things please?
Will have a look tomorrow at the GTR unit. I can't remember there being a seal there, just a slight build up of "crap". I guess if the throttles have been set to idle with a build up there, and you remove it, you may have problems. Care needs to be taken when setting up multi throttles to ensure even flow at part throttle and that they are closed at idle.

AT Power throttles are machined to 0.05mm tolerance and as such the butterfly is a perfect fit inside the bore. Each one is hand built, tested for vacuum, and set to idle condition (which isn't actually required with an IACV).
__________________
goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2001-2009 Cem Kocu