Should I sell my pfc and get a link g4? - Page 2 - GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum

Go Back   GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum > General > Nissan Skyline > General Nissan Skyline Chat
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 9th May 2012, 11:13 PM   #16 (permalink)
Shakey Finch is R33GTR
Executive GTR Owners Club Member
 
Shakey Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 564
You need the link plug in, afm blanking pipes and exhaust sensor welded in. However the functionality and end result of the link ecu is worth it.

Abbey ms supplied, fitted and mapped the link in my car, and the end result is fantastic!
__________________
Back in a 33 and loving it!
Shakey Finch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2012, 11:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
stephenwap is Sick of waiting to get my car back
GTR Register User
 
stephenwap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ireland
Cars owned: Toyota supra tt, midnight purple R33 GTR, bayside blue R34GTR
Posts: 498
Ok thanks for the info guys, it's pretty hard for me to justify 1150 plus mapping when I already have a power fc
__________________
stephenwap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2012, 12:18 PM   #18 (permalink)
bwrgtr is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenwap View Post
Ok thanks for the info guys, it's pretty hard for me to justify 1150 plus mapping when I already have a power fc
changing ecu's aint gonna get any more power magically, if its mapped properly in the first place, new ecu aint getting you more, however if u want to have more features than pfc, than u will have to justify the added expense for same power
__________________
bwrgtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2012, 10:12 AM   #19 (permalink)
blue34 is GTROC
GTROC Member
 
blue34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire
Cars owned: R34GTR
Posts: 2,995
I took out and FconVpro, an HKS EVC VI boostcontroller and an HKS Knockamp.

I now have a link G4 that resides in the original ECU case and an AEM wideband sensor. It means a lot less wiring under the dash and a much simpler set-up. Plus I can look at the logs myself on the freely available software. The link is running closed loop. Economy off boost has improved, and the midrange overtaking is a joy. I think I might re-fit an afr gauge though at some point just so I can keep an eye on fueling.

The sale of the HKS Kit pretty much covered the cost of the Link and install. At some point I'd like to upgrade to the G4 Extreme and add some more engine monitoring to include fuel pressure but for now it's fine.
__________________
blue34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2012, 10:53 AM   #20 (permalink)
Brains is nuts.
GTR Register User
 
Brains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden
Cars owned: Vcam'd R33 GT-R
Posts: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue34 View Post
I took out and FconVpro, an HKS EVC VI boostcontroller and an HKS Knockamp.

I now have a link G4 that resides in the original ECU case and an AEM wideband sensor. It means a lot less wiring under the dash and a much simpler set-up. Plus I can look at the logs myself on the freely available software. The link is running closed loop. Economy off boost has improved, and the midrange overtaking is a joy. I think I might re-fit an afr gauge though at some point just so I can keep an eye on fueling.

The sale of the HKS Kit pretty much covered the cost of the Link and install. At some point I'd like to upgrade to the G4 Extreme and add some more engine monitoring to include fuel pressure but for now it's fine.
Well, the f-con can run closed loop aswell.
I doubt that your fuel economy got better just due to the ecu change. Most likely it has got a better midrange map than you had earlier.
The fcon is quite powerful but it does have the big downsides of not being able to control the boost and you need to buy the software at the "black market ".
__________________
Brains is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2012, 11:03 AM   #21 (permalink)
Jimbostir is fukcin awsome
GTROC Member
 
Jimbostir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dropping the kids off…
Cars owned: Datsun
Posts: 1,142
£1150 +mapping is a lot of money. I'm sure everybody else is right in saying the g4 is a better ecu, but if you spent say the 1500 aprox somewhere else on the car would it be money better spent?
__________________
Jimbostir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2012, 11:45 AM   #22 (permalink)
nightcrawler is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register User
 
nightcrawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: hampshire
Posts: 858
indeed a lot of money. if you have a boost controller, pfc and uprated afms i think theres no point getting a link ecu unless you want to upgrade. but if you are starting from a standard ecu, afms and no boost controller, i think it would be better going for the link ecu instead.
__________________
nightcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2012, 11:47 AM   #23 (permalink)
davew is "Keeping the Legend alive"
GTR Register Trader
 
davew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Up North
Cars owned: R35,R34,R33,R32 and KGC10
Posts: 7,941
Spend your money elsewhere IMHO
__________________
The GTR Shop offers full workshop facilities for engine rebuilds, Restoration and Bespoke Custom Builds.
To find out more visit
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

We dismantle cars to meet all your Skyline and GTR parts and spares needs. Both new and used parts supplied. All parts guaranteed



Workshop Line +44 1429 838885

Enthusiasts since 1992.
I am a sponsor of the GTR Register!
davew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2012, 12:10 PM   #24 (permalink)
wildboy is looking for more horses
Executive GTR Owners Club Member
 
wildboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lowestoft
Cars owned: R32GTR
Posts: 953
Cheers for your thoughts guys, a proper mix of opinions as well!
I'm swaying towards the link really for a couple of reasons ie
1. Lose the afms (which is the way to go it seems)
2. Less boxes
3. Modern software
4. Future proof myself and possible changes to my future plans

Cons
1. Initial cost

I think the fact everyone would get the link if starting from scratch means it is the better long term option.
Got a lot of work on this summer so now is the time to splash out before the work dies off again lol
__________________
wildboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2012, 12:21 PM   #25 (permalink)
wildboy is looking for more horses
Executive GTR Owners Club Member
 
wildboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lowestoft
Cars owned: R32GTR
Posts: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
Spend your money elsewhere IMHO
Cheers dave, but I have haha, wheels,brakes,suspension,body styling all done bar a full respray. Got a load of parts for more power as well, cams,turbos,manifolds,elbows, rebuilding a spare head, twin plate clutch etc.

Car looks a bit different from when you sold it to me!
__________________
wildboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2012, 12:45 PM   #26 (permalink)
scoooby slayer is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register User
 
scoooby slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue34 View Post
I took out and FconVpro, an HKS EVC VI boostcontroller and an HKS Knockamp.

I now have a link G4 that resides in the original ECU case and an AEM wideband sensor. It means a lot less wiring under the dash and a much simpler set-up. Plus I can look at the logs myself on the freely available software. The link is running closed loop. Economy off boost has improved, and the midrange overtaking is a joy. I think I might re-fit an afr gauge though at some point just so I can keep an eye on fueling.

The sale of the HKS Kit pretty much covered the cost of the Link and install. At some point I'd like to upgrade to the G4 Extreme and add some more engine monitoring to include fuel pressure but for now it's fine.
fcon vpro runs closed loop i run it on my supra.
__________________
scoooby slayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2012, 03:00 PM   #27 (permalink)
blue34 is GTROC
GTROC Member
 
blue34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire
Cars owned: R34GTR
Posts: 2,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by scoooby slayer View Post
fcon vpro runs closed loop i run it on my supra.
Yes it does and I did have mine on closed loop for a while but for whatever reason we got some unexpected results, with the map richening up.

It's hard to make a comparison as like someone else said it's the map and the ECU. I'm just happier with more modern and more open hardware / software and I like the way the car runs on the Link.
__________________
blue34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2012, 03:44 PM   #28 (permalink)
Mark@Abbey M/S is looking forward to racing on the circuits again soon
GTR Register Trader
 
Mark@Abbey M/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The workshop...
Cars owned: Skylines...
Posts: 3,261
Both the F-con and G4 link need an external AFR guage with a 5 volt output to run
closed loop.

Both systems need external knock reading units to give again a 0-5v output with regards knock noise so both can be set up for full knock control.

G4 link only has 4 coil drivers where a the F-con has 8 coil driver, G4 has full closed loop boost control built it.

Both F-con and G4 can have multi maps , which can include speed compensated fuel and ignition maps with other maps and controlling signals set up. This can be used to control other items on the car like water methanol control , extra fuel pumps etc etc.

The Power FC J-detro doesn't have multi maps/boost control speed compensated fuel and ignition maps . it doe shave an engine noise indicator as well as air flow meter and injector maximum warnings, is very user friendly you can map it yourslef like the G4 can be self tuned; But it does do a good job for it's price.

If it was me if you have any reason to change the Air flow meters on your car I would look to fit a G4 Link , far better system, has many awesome built datalogging within the ECU and even better with a laptop connected. Very configurable will run 12 injectors dry NOS system , flat shift, launch control ( very good when set up especially the advance launch control) more than I can remember.

If I was going to fit a Link to a drag or race car or a high BHP road car I would look at a Link Extreme for it's 8 coil driver set up and full internal knock control thou.

Any questions ask away.
__________________
Servicing/tuning all Skyline models since 1990
Ecutek/Cobb/Syvecs and Up Rev approved tuners
In house Dynapack dyno
Up to date diagnostics for all Nissan,s Consult 1/2/3
Laser 4 wheel alignment equipment
Corner weight scales for trackset up
Tuner of the fastest Rb26 powered car in Europe
Any information needed give us a ring or mail us

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I am a sponsor of the GTR Register!
Mark@Abbey M/S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2012, 07:23 PM   #29 (permalink)
Ryan.g is never at home!
GTR Register User
 
Ryan.g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Cars owned: R35GTR, Toyota Supra
Posts: 287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark@Abbey M/S View Post
Both the F-con and G4 link need an external AFR guage with a 5 volt output to run
closed loop.

Both systems need external knock reading units to give again a 0-5v output with regards knock noise so both can be set up for full knock control.

G4 link only has 4 coil drivers where a the F-con has 8 coil driver, G4 has full closed loop boost control built it.

Both F-con and G4 can have multi maps , which can include speed compensated fuel and ignition maps with other maps and controlling signals set up. This can be used to control other items on the car like water methanol control , extra fuel pumps etc etc.

The Power FC J-detro doesn't have multi maps/boost control speed compensated fuel and ignition maps . it doe shave an engine noise indicator as well as air flow meter and injector maximum warnings, is very user friendly you can map it yourslef like the G4 can be self tuned; But it does do a good job for it's price.

If it was me if you have any reason to change the Air flow meters on your car I would look to fit a G4 Link , far better system, has many awesome built datalogging within the ECU and even better with a laptop connected. Very configurable will run 12 injectors dry NOS system , flat shift, launch control ( very good when set up especially the advance launch control) more than I can remember.

If I was going to fit a Link to a drag or race car or a high BHP road car I would look at a Link Extreme for it's 8 coil driver set up and full internal knock control thou.

Any questions ask away.
Mark,

Have you actually setup the Knock control on a Link?

I read somewhere it can only log up to 50ms!! This is no where near fast enough to setup knock control properly..

Ryan
__________________
Ryan.g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2012, 07:41 PM   #30 (permalink)
wildboy is looking for more horses
Executive GTR Owners Club Member
 
wildboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lowestoft
Cars owned: R32GTR
Posts: 953
How good is the knock control on a powerfc?
__________________
wildboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2001-2013 Cem Kocu

demoMedia