|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Matt.H
is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Swad, Near Burton on Trent
Cars owned: Vauxhall Corsa 1.4 16v Sport
Posts: 15
|
LCD TV's
Does anyone know their stuff with these? i'm thinkin of getting one and just dont know what to go for. I want a 20" screen. but they do a 4:3 and 16:9 ratio. what is the difference in these apart from one beind widescreen. someone told me that the 4:3 would have a tiny pcture when watchin films...is this right?
Also when it come to resolution, contrast etc what should i be lookin for? These are what i have been lookin at. Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 cheers.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Luke Emmott
is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kent
Cars owned: Nissan Navara Outlaw and Honda CTR
Posts: 1,193
|
Whatever you do...
Don't buy from RGB!!! Bunch of idiots! Ive had a few customers with burnt fingers from them.
As for the TV, i'd go with 16:9. Luke
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Nick MW
is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beds
Posts: 1,588
|
I would go 16:9 every time if you can justify the extra expense. Most films and an ever increasing amount of terrestrial broadcasts are widescreen.
Cathode ray is a better picture still IMO, but the LCD is worth the sacrifice just for the space saving and appearance.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
moleman
is 8'15 BTG, 350@hubs, 1600kg
Aghast at the arrogance!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,289
|
Quote:
No. You can't beat CRT, but they are so damn big.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Bassman
is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
|
Ina nutshell you don't want to buy a 4:3 screen for TV or film use as pretty much everything is now in 16:9 format (unless you like the letterbox black bars
).For LCD you want a screen with a high contrast ratio but just as important is the lowest pixel latency you can find. In general there are two areas that LCD's loose out to Plasmas and CRT (other than the fact they have square pixels). Firstly the blacks are not very black (and consequently the darker greys tend to merge into one on the cheaper panels). Secondly the pixel latency means that you get motion blurring and general loss of definition in smooth fade colours. The best commercial panels I have seen (I don't get to see the domestic stuff) are the latest Sharp ones. One other point, you may want to consider ensuring is that anything you buy supports HD (interface wise) as it's comin' over that thar hill ![]() Finally if you are absolutley anal about the picture quality over everything else then I'm afraid you will still have to buy yourself a 100Hz flatscreen CRT.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Luke Emmott
is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kent
Cars owned: Nissan Navara Outlaw and Honda CTR
Posts: 1,193
|
LCD
Looking at the sets and price range he's chosen, I don't think he's TOO fussed on what he's getting
Luke
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
roguejackal
is gutted the GTR is going
GTR Register User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Suffolk
Cars owned: GTR32, Ford Transit 2.4TD Splitter Van, Land Rover Discovery
Posts: 498
|
Id agree with the last 2 posts, though cant see any point in buying any sort of new tv that is not HD ready unless its a cheap portable
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|