Installing camshafts - GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum

Go Back   GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum > General > Nissan Skyline > Engine Mods
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 18th May 2007, 10:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
Alecci is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
 
Alecci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sweden
Cars owned: '99 R34 GTR
Posts: 416
Installing camshafts

Hi mates,

I'll be installing my new camshafts shortly. I'll be running the following items:

TOMEI ProCam 260° Lift 10.25mm Intake Camshaft
TOMEI ProCam 252° Lift 9.15mm Exhaust Camshaft

Is there any work that needs to be done when installing them, or any extra parts that I must (not should) include?

Since I'm putting about £8,500-£9,000 into the car for this season, funds are a little low and amount of time available is even lower. Therefore I intend to upgrade valve springs, lifters, etc only after this year's season is over.

According to my interpretation reading on various sites on the Internet, uprated valve springs and/or lifters are only necessary when going higher than 10.25mm lift.

This can be read about the TOMEI Valve Lifters:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOMEI
RB26DETT Valve Lifter
- Height of the base: 1mm
- Small base circle diam: 30
- Corresponding to the TOMEI camshaft of more than 10.25mm lift
- High strength by cold forging lightweight model approximately 32g***65288;STD 33g)
Italic and bold format applied by me.

There are also only valve springs for 10.85mm and 11.50mm lifts available, thus suggesting that uprated valve springs are not necessary to run the 10.25mm lift camshafts. Comment?

Cheers!

/ Alex
__________________
Alecci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 03:28 AM   #2 (permalink)
pupsi is RIPs BUILT TWEENIEROB INSTALLED AND MAPPED.
New Users
 
pupsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West London
Cars owned: GTR R33.
Posts: 3,329
I'me installing Tomei 280 duration 10.8 lift, was advised by almost everyone to change springs and install solid lifters, recommended with these cams. Hope this has helped.
__________________
pupsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 07:33 AM   #3 (permalink)
Mark@Abbey M/S is looking forward to racing on the circuits again soon
GTR Register Trader
 
Mark@Abbey M/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The workshop...
Cars owned: Skylines...
Posts: 3,285
All RB26DETT have solid lifters.

If you run anything over the 9.15mm in the TOMEI cam range, lift you need to fit the Tomei Valve springs and the thicker lifter (buckets) as the 10.25mm lift cams have smaller base circles , this is how they get the extra lift.
__________________
Servicing/tuning all Skyline models since 1990
Ecutek/Cobb/Syvecs and Up Rev approved tuners
In house Dynapack dyno
Up to date diagnostics for all Nissan,s Consult 1/2/3
Laser 4 wheel alignment equipment
Corner weight scales for trackset up
Tuner of the fastest Rb26 powered car in Europe
Any information needed give us a ring or mail us

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I am a sponsor of the GTR Register!
Mark@Abbey M/S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 09:30 AM   #4 (permalink)
Alecci is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
 
Alecci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sweden
Cars owned: '99 R34 GTR
Posts: 416
Now I'm a little bit confused, maybe it's my crappy language skills... How come I need springs and lifters when there's no springs available for that lift and it's clearly stated that the lifters are for lifts higher than 10.25mm?

I don't mean to be a bitch about it, since I'm in need of help and when such is given I'm very grateful for it. But why these contradictions?

Also, is there any work needed to be done prior to the installation? Someone suggested the camshafts needs shimming (if that's the proper term for it in English)?
__________________

Last edited by Alecci; 19th May 2007 at 09:39 AM..
Alecci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 12:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
shanef is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 303
What was your reasoning behind chosing a smaller cam for the exhaust side? Really you should be running the smaller cam on the intake.

If your running the 10.25mm lift cam/s, you should (not have to) install the Stage 1 valve springs from Tomei. It's just a bit of premediated servicing, and i dont think youd like it if you developed valve bounce after you installed ur nice new cams
__________________
shanef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 01:50 PM   #6 (permalink)
Alecci is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
 
Alecci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sweden
Cars owned: '99 R34 GTR
Posts: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyndago View Post
...

Stock cams have more duration and lift on the intake side than exhaust side.

Stock intake valves are bigger than the exhaust valves.

...

Its harder to get the air in, than it is to get it out.
Mine's run the same config on their car (they have Mine's camshafts though and lifts are a little different).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mine's
MINE'S Shore 260° Lift 10.2mm Intake Camshaft
MINE'S Shore 252° Lift 9.5mm Exhaust Camshaft
__________________
Alecci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2007, 07:39 AM   #7 (permalink)
akasakaR33 is exhausted
GTROC Board Member
 
akasakaR33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tokyo
Cars owned: R33 GT-R
Posts: 1,731
why smaller exhaust - from Tomei webpage

Just an FYI - the Tomei website (in Japanese) explains the 260/252 set up (their "Type A" cams) thusly: "By setting the exhaust side angle lower, we are able to obtain stable idling and improve response at low/mid speeds. Ideal for those with normal or N1-class turbines."

In contrast, their Type B cams - 260/260 - they claim "by increasing the exhaust cam angle compared to Type A, can have both improved response, and improved peak engine power, even if using mid-size/large-size turbines."

Hope this helps.
__________________
akasakaR33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2007, 08:02 AM   #8 (permalink)
GarethK is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
 
GarethK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Darlington
Cars owned: R33 GTR V-Spec x2
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanef View Post
What was your reasoning behind chosing a smaller cam for the exhaust side? Really you should be running the smaller cam on the intake.
Most non-jap aftermarket cam setups are longer inlet than exhaust. The standard cam setup is also longer inlet, and higher lift on the inlet than the exhaust. The longer exhaust is a Jap thing I wouldn't be so sure to jump in and follow.
__________________
GarethK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2007, 06:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
Alecci is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
 
Alecci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sweden
Cars owned: '99 R34 GTR
Posts: 416
Instead of creating a new thread I thought I'd just revive this one. I bought the following parts (that applies to the head):

TOMEI Intake Camshaft Pulley
TOMEI Exhaust Camshaft Pulley
TOMEI ProCam 260° Lift 10.25mm Intake Camshaft
TOMEI ProCam 252° Lift 9.15mm Exhaust Camshaft
TOMEI Valve Lifters
TOMEI Valve Springs Lift 10.85mm

Any suggestions to what maximum safe RPM would be?
__________________
Alecci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2007, 06:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
nismo1118 is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register User
 
nismo1118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa, USA
Cars owned: 08 Evo GSR, 93 Civic, 08 Triumph Daytona 675
Posts: 199
Well what crank and crank pulley will you be running?
__________________
nismo1118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2007, 07:03 PM   #11 (permalink)
Alecci is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
 
Alecci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sweden
Cars owned: '99 R34 GTR
Posts: 416
Crank and crank pulley will be standard.

I've been looking for a good alternative for a new lightweight crank pulley, but I've not been able to find one suiting to this season's budget. If you have any suggestions, I'm all ears.

Crank will be balanced, etc after this year's season, and then I'll also install new pistons, conrods, bearings and bolts.
__________________
Alecci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2007, 10:15 PM   #12 (permalink)
shanef is unaware they can edit their status
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 303
Ross Tuffbound do an aftermarket harmonic balancer, its a bit under half the price of an ATI one too
__________________
shanef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2007, 10:47 PM   #13 (permalink)
tyndago is 2009gtr.com
GTR Register User
 
tyndago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Long Beach, California
Cars owned: Nismo R32 #500
Posts: 3,441
Send a message via AIM to tyndago
When you rev them high , the crank dampeners come apart. We tossed a couple on the GT42R - 2.8 car.

I like the ATI dampener , and SFI approved for racing in the US , the Ross , we could not use in an event.
__________________
tyndago is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2001-2013 Cem Kocu

demoMedia