2009 Nissan GT-R Engine Code and Specs: VR38VETT - Page 3 - GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum

Want to buy a banner ad? Find out more here.

Go Back   GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum > General > Nissan Skylines including R32, R33, R34 and others > General Nissan Skyline GTR Chat



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 27th August 2007, 05:05 AM   #31 (permalink)
bazooqa has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
bazooqa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bahrain
Cars owned: SKYLINE BNR32 V-SpecII GT-R
Posts: 177
7tune.com » Blog Archive » Nissan GT-R Engine Code: Not VQ
__________________
bazooqa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2007, 06:02 AM   #32 (permalink)
bonzelite is fair to partly sunny
GTR Register Member
 
bonzelite's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Cars owned: Pontiac GTO
Posts: 754
the GT-R is not going to have the same engine as the 350Z with TT added. it never was.

there would be no point in keeping that top-secret as it's already been seen and done.

the GT-R's engine has been created specifically anew for the GT-R's unique requirements.
__________________
bonzelite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2007, 09:41 PM   #33 (permalink)
zillapuss has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: nz
Cars owned: r32 gtr
Posts: 48
doesnt vr mean magnesium block in nissan speak?
__________________
zillapuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007, 10:09 AM   #34 (permalink)
Bean has no status.
GTROC Member
 
Bean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tokyo
Cars owned: Reservation receipt
Posts: 3,719
More info here...
7tune.com » Blog Archive » VR38VETT Confirmed by Holiday Auto
__________________
Bean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007, 03:44 PM   #35 (permalink)
trondhla has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norway
Cars owned: Nissan SR Turbo
Posts: 544
Hmm, turbos integrated in the exhaust manifolds. That will not be easy to swap with new/larger/better turbos. But it saves space and a few kg.

And I do hope that the weight of the car (1750 kg) is incorrect. That is at least one barrel of crude oil too much.
__________________
trondhla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2007, 06:34 AM   #36 (permalink)
Lith is lurking
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Palmy, NZ
Cars owned: R33 GTS25t
Posts: 1,300
Send a message via MSN to Lith
Weight is about the area I expected, but hoped was wrong about
__________________
Lith is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2007, 11:04 AM   #37 (permalink)
MeLLoN Stu has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
MeLLoN Stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North East
Cars owned: R33 GTR V-Spec
Posts: 1,568
Send a message via MSN to MeLLoN Stu
blembo

how reliable is that information likely to be? More so than other japanese car rags?
__________________
MeLLoN Stu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2007, 03:12 PM   #38 (permalink)
Bean has no status.
GTROC Member
 
Bean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tokyo
Cars owned: Reservation receipt
Posts: 3,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeLLoN Stu View Post
blembo

how reliable is that information likely to be? More so than other japanese car rags?
Hard to say.
They were absolutely correct about the R34 Nur when it came out. Then again, they've also been completely wrong in the past too.

There are only 2 weeks before Nissan Japan can take pre-orders and only 6 weeks before the car is officially unveiled, so at least some of the info in this review is likely to be accurate.
__________________
Bean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2007, 08:09 PM   #39 (permalink)
madadd has no status.
New Users
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North West
Cars owned: Mini Cooper S, SVT Lightning, R35-GTR
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by trondhla View Post
Hmm, turbos integrated in the exhaust manifolds. That will not be easy to swap with new/larger/better turbos. But it saves space and a few kg.

And I do hope that the weight of the car (1750 kg) is incorrect. That is at least one barrel of crude oil too much.
If this is correct .. And it only has 470-480bhp .. And it is outperforming the new 997 turbo .. Then, hell they must have worked wonders with that torque curve!

I don't believe it will be that fat. The old one was too heavy! (One of my only dislikes of the car). The new one uses high-tech materials! Feathers, bubbles of air and all sorts if light things. Lightweight is the future! Nissan won't let us down! Please!

...Mad
__________________
madadd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2007, 10:28 PM   #40 (permalink)
Andy 32 has no status.
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 21
It would be hugely expensive to build the car with lots of exotic composites.........I cant see it being a featherweight either ALA GT3 Porsche. Damn shame but I guess its possible seeing as the engine will be lighter than an RB26 and the body is alloy??

Im sure lots of you will be in Japan for the official release so you can enlighten us
__________________
Andy 32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 12:57 AM   #41 (permalink)
Bean has no status.
GTROC Member
 
Bean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tokyo
Cars owned: Reservation receipt
Posts: 3,719
They can't use loads of exotic materials as they need to keep the cost in check.
Allegedly, Nissan's goal is a 911TT competitor for Carrera money so that's what you should expect.
The later versions Nismo, v-spec or whatever will be the lightweight ones.
(hopefully).
__________________
Bean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2007, 12:35 PM   #42 (permalink)
madadd has no status.
New Users
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North West
Cars owned: Mini Cooper S, SVT Lightning, R35-GTR
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bean View Post
They can't use loads of exotic materials as they need to keep the cost in check.
Allegedly, Nissan's goal is a 911TT competitor for Carrera money so that's what you should expect.
The later versions Nismo, v-spec or whatever will be the lightweight ones.
(hopefully).
Maybe I shouldn't have used the word light. Maybe lighter.

The R33/R34 were not exactly light cars. If Nissan is hoping to outperform the 911 turbo in a car that weighs 1750kg and has 470-480bhp then the space under the torque curve would have to be huge (due to the 200kg increase in weight over the 911).And remember the 911 turbo has a fantastic spread of torque to begin with!

To get that performance something magical has to be happening (either some real clever technology OR weight saving)

Thus, I can't see how the car can be that heavy. I would expect the weight to drop below that of the 34. Not increase above it. And certainly be nowhere near 1750kg. I'll bet my trousers on it!!

...Mad
__________________
madadd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2007, 06:51 AM   #43 (permalink)
Bean has no status.
GTROC Member
 
Bean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tokyo
Cars owned: Reservation receipt
Posts: 3,719
Well, I admire your optimism, but I'm convinced it'll be heavier than the BNR34.
I mean, just look at the weight of the Fairlady Z or the Skyline (G37) coupe.
__________________
Bean is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2001-2009 Cem Kocu