|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
bonzelite
is fair to partly sunny
GTR Register Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Cars owned: Pontiac GTO
Posts: 754
|
Quote:
And the Nurburgring times matter a great deal when the hi-brow elitists discuss Ferraris and Porsches --but wait-- these times suddenly "don't really matter much" when discussing a GT-R! Isn't that peculiar?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
GTRJack
has no status.
GTR Register Member
|
Nurburgring time is VERY important. Nurburging is a naturel track close with similarity to a normal road we drive everyday (at least me in Norway). How well a road car do at the Nurgburgring is the ultimate proof of how well that car is built as a high end performer. Those who say that Nurburgring time is not important or doesn't matter for a production high end performance road car is a ****ing idiot, sorry for the straightness!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
skyline69_uk
has no status.
GTROC Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NI
Cars owned: R32 GT-R (bhp= a fair bit), Ohlins R&T etc etc
Posts: 2,887
|
I'm sure most have seen the new website and some other articles here
Nissan GT-R Official Global Site Nissan GT-R Japanese pricing announced; 'Ring runs continue | Car News Blog at Motor Trend More Details, New Images of 2009 Nissan GT-R
__________________
Do it right or don't do it at all. "You're a pack of a**holes!" - Jim Richards 1992. スカイライン69 UK |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |
|
Blow Dog
is doing an anti-rain dance
Administrator
|
Quote:
There's no questioning the loyalty of those on this site, most are current or previous owners of GTR's. The huge difference you seem so keen to dismiss is that when owners of Ferrari's or Porsches discuss Nurburgring times, it's normally as a result of a publicly announced figure that can be classed as official! Not some speculative figures bandied about on internet forums accompanied by the odd photo of a stopwatch on tarmac of a racetrack! I digress, there may come a time where the figures are realised, but until then we can ONLY treat them with speculation and limited cynicism. Nissan are known for the massive hype machine that they are and the absurd fact that the car is still being tested on the ring with the ridiculous car bra is tantamount to the fact that Nissan are kings of titilation and they enjoy the fact that we, as proud supporters and loyal subjects, are keen to discuss and aid the hype machine in the name of marketing excellence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
bonzelite
is fair to partly sunny
GTR Register Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Cars owned: Pontiac GTO
Posts: 754
|
Quote:
Here is a recap of the philosophy among us: 1) Nissan is a liar 2) Outside sources are a liar 3) Every lap time is a lie and cannot be proven no matter who has taken the time or from what source or mode of measuring 4) Special tires have made the lap times possible but nothing else, the car itself is lacking
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
GTRJack
has no status.
GTR Register Member
|
I kind of a little bit agree with bonzelite that some here is being a bit unnecessary pessimistic but let me say that being too optimistic is not good either.
Speculation is speculation but we have to try to stay realistic and logical, how can we do that? Well as we've known for months that the new GTR is targeting the new 911 Turbo. We've seen video examples of the new GTR seemly being sharper and a bit quicker then the 911 Turbo in the performance. NOW that we know the fact that the new 911 Turbo does 7:40 at the Nurgburgring. Tell me then from a logical view point, "why the fowk does 7:38 seems so unbelievable for some?" Speculation? Yeah in some degree for sure but for some it's easy to use "the word speculation" as an cover for being negative, pessimistic and a hypocrite. My opinion try to stay logical, realistic and look beyond your bias for once, this is too all that argues on this thread.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
bonzelite
is fair to partly sunny
GTR Register Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Cars owned: Pontiac GTO
Posts: 754
|
Quote:
The 2 seconds better, had it been reversed in favor of Porsche (as stated earlier), would have been met with cigars, wine, women, and song in the exclusive inner sanctum of the Posche-phile congnoscenti circle, drunk with arrogant sophistication at the country-club. This is why "2 seconds," despite how actually noteworthy this time is for the Nurburgring, is being denied. Wait until the GT-R nears or exceeds the Carrera GT ---this is when the mocking and jeering will worsen and become highly exaggerated in the press and popular culture circles of motorsport. The ruthless aloofness and dismissals of naysayers has barely begun! ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
GTRJack
has no status.
GTR Register Member
|
My thought is that I just don't understand the sceptism from some. This is a GTR site and I think that people should be open minded and enthusiatic about this car- a little bit of speculation doesn't hurt. We should be happy for what Nissan is trying to make.
In terms of bank for buck performance I have no doubt that this car would do good but saying it will beat the Carrera GT is way over the line of being optimistic; close or not, we shall see.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
King Nismo
has no status.
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orlando FL
Cars owned: 05 GT2
Posts: 434
|
If the Nissan GT-R really is that close to matching the Carrera GT time on the Nurburgring what is the point of even thinking about buying it
![]() I wonder what is going to happen in the tuning world for the car. That is where my focus is not being stock but being modified. Sooner or later it will get to the point of being heavily modified like the old ones best believe that. I seriously can't see top companies like HKS, Tomei etc not making parts for the car. But as everything else....time will tell all.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
kismetcapitan
is like trees in November...
Toluene Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seoul Korea
Cars owned: BNR32, BMW F800S, BMW S1000RR
Posts: 8,261
|
the main problem is hacking into the goddam computers these days. Someone would have to create a standalone ECU that could handle all the OBD-II crap, the fly-by-wire everything, the transmission shifting, as well as fueling, ignition, and boost maps. We're talking a whole nother realm of complex beyond a simple 16bit Power FC. Parts is easy. Engine parts haven't changed much in ages. Its the computer control that's the problem. Getting everything to work together is hard enough on an ancient straight six design like the RB, where a tuner controls an honestly small amount by software (injectors, ignition, and boost solenoid, maybe a couple electric fans). New-wave tuning won't just be mapping, they'll have to sync computer-controlled compenents together. I'm sure it can be done. Just not by me
![]()
__________________
There are only three true sports: mountain climbing, motor racing, and bullfighting. Everything else is merely a game. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
King Nismo
has no status.
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orlando FL
Cars owned: 05 GT2
Posts: 434
|
I guess...But regardless if it is "perfect" in most peoples eyes it is a heavy car. It isn't the fastest thing on the streets and it won't take much power for the old GT-Rs to beat it plain and simple. What is the point of having a bigger more powerful engine and you can't use it. Everyone knows 480ps won't be enough to last forever. I am sure someone will come out with aftermarket support for the car if it is basic to the most extreme and wild. It may be 6 months from release date to 4 years from now but it will happen.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|