View Single Post
Old 14th July 2008, 12:10 PM   #147 (permalink)
Sidious
GTR Register Member
 
Sidious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by Addicted2Boost View Post
Well ur speculation that was given sure is stupid and non-sense.

And thats exactly what i feel about ur arguement and u fail to understand even basic points even when another car is mentioned for example, and just dismiss them due to ur biased view. Every time i say has been recorded, somehow is just bullshit in ur books, or the track is shit, or watever allowing you to fall back on ur weak arguement... in that there is none. Just full of excuses, and maybes and watever. Other ppl on there have also confirmed to you that those times are valid and credible...

Or maybe im just a stupid 14 year old yeah. Hmm, looking at this poll, majority of ppl seem to have a similar opinion... maybe the almost of them are just as stupid to realise your superior way of thinking
The fastest circuit and road cars over the past 60 years have the best packaging of mass, low drag, low weight, low COG and the best balance. Mid-engined cars tend to meet these criteria best.

You havent provided any evidence to the contary. You see one laptime on Nordschielfe which IS NOT PROOF, just a MANUFACTURER CLAIM - and you make a song and dance about it in every post.

I dont dismiss proof if it is from a reputable and fair source. Perhaps if you can provide some of this for once then I wont see it as bullshit.

You call me biased? I owned 2 GT-Rs, one which is claimed to lap under 8 minutes at the ring, but I dont believe it. The difference is I dont think they are the fastest things on the planet, which atleast makes me a little more open minded and appreciative of other slower or faster cars that I may or may never be able to drive.
Sidious is offline   Reply With Quote