|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: -7 or -5 turbos? | |||
| -5 for power - gimme gimme gimme! |
|
61 | 63.54% |
| -7 for spool-up - it's a street car after all! |
|
35 | 36.46% |
| Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#106 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vancover, Canada
Posts: 56
|
I‘m catching up with this thread and I would like to also comment on the two different turbos producing the same Horse Power but at different pressures topic. The internal stresses of the engine are the same for both turbo setups, but the real difference is in the thermal efficiency of the engine & turbo and the efficiency of all heat exchangers involved (Air / Water / Oil). Yes the higher boost pressure will generate more heat and less dense air charge but in the end has the same number of Oxygen molecules to generate the same Horse Power at the same cylinder pressures. It’s the heat generated and the heat that is needed to be dissipated that is the real difference and problem.
One of the biggest topics anywhere is always the turbo response or spool up time and how much horse [power you can make. But if people gave it more thought about heat dissipation and air density and air temperature you can generate more Horse Power and longevity only when you have less heat. Less heat means less boost required for a given horse Power. Look at I think its Ludders Car, Massive horse power at low boost. Did you see the Intercooler he’s got on the thing? For a truly good setup you need to consider the NASA calculations matching the parts to the application. That’s the hardest part cause as time goes by the application changes as you get used to more and more power and make more and more changes to the car. |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 (permalink) | |
|
New Users
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 2,069
|
Quote:
This in turn causes detonation which will destroy your pistons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vancover, Canada
Posts: 56
|
There are a few other things that cause detonation like timing and fuel / air ratio and fuel octane. If a turbo gives you variable displacement then Alcohol or Toluene injection gives you variable Octane. Variable Octane gives you variable boost capabilities and variable fuel selection at the pumps. Personally I think the compressor map is more important then the turbine selection. Pick the horse power level you want to build to or pick the response and lack of lag for the job. The rest is all along for the ride. Be realistic / conservative in your expectations and you will be happy with the results. Mines has shown that the fastest response is not the biggest horse power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 (permalink) | |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: new zealand
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
I also had turbos that were very close to the -7s/gt ss before these ones and yes they spool very fast but run out of puff at the top. The -5s just keep pulling and dont want to run out,start moving from 3k and dump you in your seat at 4k ..Im in Wellington if you would like to have a looksie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ChCh NZ
Posts: 221
|
I Have -5's in my car, I drive it everyday to work (This will have to change soon!) and they are not laggy at all, Like N1SMO said I wouldn't bother going for the -7's....The extra power of the -5's is well worth it. Mine start producing boost at 2500rpm and are really into it by 3000rpm. I am also running Tomei PonCams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: co antrim n.ireland
Posts: 133
|
what sort of power would you reckon out of 2560-7s runnin 1.1 bar of boost? getting my car mapped next week and just wondering!o and it has stock internals... would i maybe be better goin to 1.0 bar of boost?? or just get -5s???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: brmingham
Posts: 434
|
I have gt2860-5's with stock cams /engine @ 1.1 bar and they are not laggy at all. Currently still finshing of mapping but they start spooling around 2k and by 4-4.5k ish your rocking all the way to 7.5-8k.
Last edited by n boost; 15th September 2008 at 02:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ChCh NZ
Posts: 221
|
Just got my car back from the tuners.
With the 2860-5's and Tomei Poncams it makes 512hp at all four wheels with only 20psi at 6800rpm and 450 lbft at 4800rpm. Boost starts at 2000rpm, and basicly just goes straight up from there! I don't think I would bother with -7's or anything else smaller than the -5's with the response I'm getting, car is a little "cammy" sounding now with the cam timing....But it has won the "monster response" award from the tuners. |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 (permalink) | |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: new zealand
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
![]() They are a "tad" more responsive than 2530s but do give away a few kws up top, but who cares when they respond fast and slam hard..perfect street low mounts on a RB26DETT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 (permalink) | |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ChCh NZ
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
Yup, they sure produce the goods down low Andy! just wish the car didn't drink as much gas as it does....Time to buy a Prius |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|