|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Admin - GTROC D.T.C
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Living life 8min 50 secs at a time
Posts: 9,608
|
Turbofuelcell - FAO those wot no a bit about chemicals and shizzle
seriously, a guy i know with a landrover is about to buy one of these.
my brain is too small to explain to him how it MUST be a scam. so, could one of you lot have look and tell me what its all about TurboFuelCell - TurboFuelCell mook
__________________
FOR ALL GTR FORUM RELATED ISSUES CONTACT THE ADMIN TEAM 'MOOKISTAR' OR 'MOLEMAN' SKYLINE FAQ'S! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 189
|
Of course its a scam, you cant just bolt a fuel cell to a IC engine and expect it to work.
A) If it worked the car manufacturers would be using it B) If it sounds to good to be true it is C) A fool and his money........ |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 257
|
have a look at this HHO gas is a genuine gas and can be burnt. Hydrogen Technologies have been using it in a test vehicle.. and on their site it warns about scam sites using the technology to run engines off HHO gas.
Have a look at Hydrogen Technology Applications, Inc. for more info this looks like the real deal and even they say powering your car on part HHO gas (from electolysis of water) and normal petrol is some way off yet, let alone completley powering your car of HHO gas alone. Overall cost needs investigating yeah might get more milage by burning HHO gas mixed with petrol but what is the cost of creating the HHO gas in the first place?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
GTR Register Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 257
|
just read a bit more off the 'dodgy' site
Quote: 50 litres of fuel in your tank = 10 litres (20%) are burned i.e. used in driving your vehicle 40 litres (80%) wasted and blown out through the exhaust Catalytic converters are required to burn off this excess 40 litres of fuel to stop pollution. This 80% wastage figure gets even worse during winter. When a strong smell of Petrol or Diesel is apparent when you (or other motorists) start your car and drive in the morning during winter you are not imagining it, because less of your fuel is being burned and more is being thrown out through the exhaust, hence the strong smell. This extra wastage is due to the fact that the fuel is cold and needs heating up. Minor adjustments can overcome this problem. End quote What a load of bo**ocks 40 liters of fuel down your exhaust.. maybe if yor using a Bee*R constantly LOL! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
New Users
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Black R33 GTR V-Spec
Posts: 1,668
|
It's rubbish, but statement is kinda 'based' on fact (petrol engines are about 20% efficient iirc). Doesn't mean 80% is petrol blown through the exhaust though. lol @ the rich mixture for cold starting petrol smell 'proof', and the cat for burning all that fuel which is 'wasted' out the exhaust...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||
|
New Users
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Near Sheffield
Posts: 2,930
|
Quote:
Quote:
Works on a diesel does it ? I hardly think so........ Im sure with more time spent this could be picked apart for the scam it is. Quote:
__________________
I am Jacks complete lack of surprise. Last edited by Marky_GTSt; 3rd July 2008 at 05:21 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
New Users
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Near Sheffield
Posts: 2,930
|
Quote:
25% Power 25% Noise 50% Heat From 100% potential from petrol, If any goes down the pipe then the CAT gets melted.... So reducing friction seems the obvious way to get more bang per buck.
__________________
I am Jacks complete lack of surprise. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|