Want to buy a banner ad? Find out more here.

Go Back   GT-R Register - Official Nissan Skyline and GTR Owners Club forum > General > Nissan Skylines including R32, R33, R34 and others > Tuning: General



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 26th July 2008, 01:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
GTR Register Member
 
Asim R32GTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Norway / Oslo
Posts: 928
Single throttlebody vs multi / stock?

Hi

I did a search, but could not find a good answer for this.

I have a R32GTR, it is still running stock multi throttlebody`s.

Has anyone got first hand experience with conversion to single throttlebody?
Did it make much difference?
Are the stock ones restrictive?
etc..

My car is going on the dyno on Wednesday, i need to decide which plenum to use, since i have both available.

Thanks
Asim
Asim R32GTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 06:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
GTR Register Member
 
palmer77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Burton on Trent
Posts: 220
i believe the multi ones give better response......
palmer77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 06:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
New Users
 
Madden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 2,078
Rk tuning runs standard throttle bodies on his cars. They must be good.
Madden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 07:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
Noob
 
andreasgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,147
Send a message via ICQ to andreasgtr
Rain runs a single one on his R32. I think it is because you can't get bigger diameter intake plenums with stock throttles. So bigger plenums with higher flow capacity have a single throttle body.
But that's just my try to explain it.
andreasgtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 07:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
GTROC Member
 
Stachi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 834
Send a message via ICQ to Stachi Send a message via MSN to Stachi
I'm with you on this Andreas.. Would be way to much work to make bigger single throttles and imo wouldn't make that much difference on big power applications.

BTW, have you gone for NOS yet, as advertised on the other forum? :P

Marc
Stachi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 10:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
GTROC Member
 
lightspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South-west
Posts: 1,803
You can bore out the stock 45mm throttles for either 48 or 50mm throttles.

You can also machine the spindle to have flat sides.

The other mod is PTFE washers to stop the shaft seals blowing out with high boost. Reinik make these.
lightspeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 10:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
New Users
 
Madden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 2,078
When should you upgrade to ported or big single throttle bodies?
Madden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 10:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
GTR Register Member
 
GT-R Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Waiuku NZ
Posts: 1,222
Send a message via ICQ to GT-R Glenn
Standard ones are a serious piece of work do not underestimate hpw good rb26 parts are.
Except the oil pump drive....
Quote:
When should you upgrade to ported or big single throttle bodies?
When you make over 1000 hp
GT-R Glenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 10:58 PM   #9 (permalink)
New Users
 
paul cawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 2,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madden View Post
When should you upgrade to ported or big single throttle bodies?
RK never changed his plenum even when he ran 9s, but the throttles were over sized.
paul cawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 11:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
New Users
 
Madden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 2,078
Sounds good to me
Madden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2008, 09:35 AM   #11 (permalink)
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 169
Advantage of single throttle body is that you can ditch the standard airflow meters and run an aftermarket ECU with a MAP sensor. A single throttle can be made absolutely huge, so any real or imagined flow restriction of the multi throttles will be eliminated. The big plenum volume behind the single throttle damps out the worst of the pressure pulsing, so a MAP sensor at least has a fighting chance of indicating engine load.

There is another aspect to all this as well. Multi throttles are much more cam friendly. If you are running extreme cams, multi throttles will idle smoother and run cleaner and be less lumpy at part throttle lowish rpm.

Multi throttles can cause diabolical problems tuning a MAP based system at small throttle openings, if you are going aftermarket ECU, that uses a MAP sensor, a single throttle will give much better and more stable part throttle mixtures, and as a result, quite likely the potential for much better part throttle fuel economy in a road car.

A single throttle is very popular among the drag racing crowd, but the big disadvantage is throttle response. If you are a drag racer the throttle has only two positions anyway, so who cares about throttle response?

The circuit racers sure do !!!

Try nursing a GTR around a wet race track at full racing speed right on the limit of adhesion. You are driving on the throttle, and you want crisp instant part throttle response, or you are going to go off the track, or be the last car in the pack.

The serious circuit race cars NEVER fit single throttles. The drag racers mostly do. What are you going to use YOUR car for ?

So basically there are several quite different things to think about, mostly depending on how you plan to use your car.

Top end airflow
Throttle response and drivability
Idle quality and lumpiness with big cams.
Compatibility with the ECU, (flow meters or MAP sensor)
Part throttle mixture control and part throttle fuel economy.

Decide what is most important to you and modify accordingly.

Last edited by Warpspeed; 29th July 2008 at 09:47 AM.
Warpspeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2008, 09:58 AM   #12 (permalink)
GTR Register Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 169
One last thought on all this.

The cam friendly part of having multi throttles is why a GTR engine can pass strict emissions testing without using variable inlet cam timing. The single throttle RB25DE(T) cannot get away with it. Variable inlet timing is there for passing emissions, and no other reason. It is certainly not a power enhancer.

Variable valve timing does nothing for power, which is why the GTR never had it.

So before you bin the multi throttles, realize that if you plan to run big cams the engine is going to be rougher and lumpier and be a lot more unhappy at idle because of increased exhaust reversion.
Warpspeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2008, 12:48 PM   #13 (permalink)
New Users
 
tarmac terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hampshire, but Scottish through and through!
Posts: 2,622
Send a message via MSN to tarmac terror
AT LAST!! some decent info...

Nice one mate.

TT
tarmac terror is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2008, 10:27 PM   #14 (permalink)
GTR Register Member
 
SamuraiSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 390
The stock ITBs give far better throttle response than a single throttle. Just go to google and type in ITB to read about the advantages.
SamuraiSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2008, 10:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
GTR Register Member
 
Asim R32GTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Norway / Oslo
Posts: 928
Warpspeed:

Thanks for the info mate, exactly what i was looking for

Decided to keep stock throttle bodys!

Asim
Asim R32GTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2001-2008 Cem Kocu