are skyline turbos sequential or pararllel?
if parallel, then why would having one bg one be any more laggy than two small ones? since it has twice the gas flow feeding it?
In yuor position personally, I would concentrate on egtting as much torque as you can from your engine, and seeing what that leads you to power wise.
Torque is what will make the car feel quick. Not saying that high power cars are slow though.
In imprezas ville, we have conisdered the merits of twin turbos. The main problem that has put us off is the relative diifulty of boost control compared with using a single turbo.
I dont see why this is the case. What would be wrong with using tow turbos, and operating one very large external wastegate, which air injector boost control?
Regardless of this,
big turbo, lots of boost, charge cooling, and a well set up map.
The internals to take all the strain, and if possible substantially higher rev limit will yield lots of power.
You will then need the cams to accomodate.
Personally I am anti no2. I dont like the idea of havign power on tap that comes via refillign a canister.
Arguably water injection gives you the same kind of thing, but I just cant see it that way. Nos to me, is like running race gas. It is non renewable, and so when it runs out, your car is no longer a 1000bhp car.
I like the idea of you put in fuel (and water), and the car can produce X all day long.
trouble is charge cooling properties of NO2 are great for det prevention. but thats another argument.