what sort of shape would you mould the flat sheet aft of the rear axles ?
is this going to be a complex shape or could I just screw a sheet of ply on for testing ?
the bodykit I am getting is a drift style one It is a little higher at the back than at the point behind the rear wheels, I'll know If it is feasable to do this in a week or so when I recieve the kit.
If I were to rivet a flat sheet to the rear section will it form a parachute and rip the car up ?
What you need to do is look under the car and realise that any 'void' or 'scoop' will cause turbulence, which both slows you down and increases instability.
If you can slip your hand into 'pockets' between the body panels and the main monocoque, take a look at the area under the rear bumper, it is a huge scoop that at speed lifts the rear of the car quite markedly.
Flat everytime, don't try to shape it except if that shape more adequately covers an area gaining a reward for doing so.
Filling voids with expanding foam is very very good, done this myself, the trick is to first put a thin plastic sheet into the void and then fill it, file off excess. cover with the flat sheet, the reaos for the plastic is so that it can be removed easily from the monocoque [only works where the plug of foam is locked in by adjoining panels.
I did this to my first Soarer and the increase in stability at speed is really very marked indeed.
BTW, it is not a pain at all, this thread is 20months old and only now are cars appearing with what was in here, take a good look under the new Mac Merc... you might be surprised and what is under there...
I have always been led to beleive that 8 degrees was a safe angle to work with to ensure you don't ger seperation and stall. The longer you can make it the better, and the further forward you can start it the better (within reason).
As mycroft points out, fancy shapes aren't required. The aim is to encourage air to exit freely from under the car, not to actively suck it out.
Although the pressure difference will be small, don't forget that a very small low pressure over such a large area may create significant forces (we hope!) so using 1.6mm aluminium isn't the way.
I don't think it's ideal as such just an angle which you can use, pretty safe in the knowledge you wont stall the diffuser. By that, I mean the air will remain attached to the surface, and flow in an orderly fashion. As soon as it seperates you lose the flow speed and the low pressure, worse still turbulence can cause high pressure due to slow moving (and therefore high pressure) air that may circulate between the ground and diffuser.
I would avoid having the diff penetrate the diffuser if possible, simply because you can't know what's going to happen with any certainty. Flat and simple is low risk.
As for entry, just try and get is as smooth and simple as possible, crap in, crap out as they say.
I have recieved the sample of the brush material and measured my 200sx up.
In order to reach the ground like the Lotus in TRC mag they need to be 5" long. but i read in the body of this that due to a freak effect there is no turbulence encountered for the first couple of inches if the ride height is 6 inches.
So doea this mean that if I put the 4" brush material on the design will still work or should I look to copying the setup on the lotus?
I am trying to find a supplier for either carbon or kevlar or some other sheet material which has similar propeties to use for a front and rear under tray.
Are there any considerations I need to make to get this to work ? or is a flat sheet as discussed the way to go ? what about fins on the underside etc...
I could always use some more of the brushes !!
I am also looking into the saab bits you talked about.
The only thing I will not be using for now is the sideburns idea, as I am getting a nice bodykit and don't want to hide the nice wide arches for a while !!
What sort of thickness is right for the under tray ? what sort of forces are these things under ?
will the added weight of all this more be more than compensated for by the addition of it ?
sorry about the ??'s but I am just checking before I go and spend the best part of 500 quid on various parts..
Right I have bolted a sheet of aluminium to the front and rear sections of the underside of the bodykit.
These run from the edges to just before the axles from each end.
they are flat 1.5mm sheet.
I have instantly got a benifit and that is reduced movement of the fibreglass kit.
I have also got 2 off 3m garage door brushes ready to bolt on. the brushes have been ordered so they miss the road surface by about 1 inch. obviously they will receive a pounding but they are sacrificial to an extent.
my next questions are regarding the car on the magazine.. you can clearly see the brushes on it and they go to the floor. In a previous post Mycroft mentioned about having the brushes on the sills and another set at the ratio mentioned 1/6th each side of centre.
so was the brush set up on the lotus at full width and then having inner ones too ?
next it was suggested that I "flute" the brush shape toward the rear. how much wider at the rear should the brushes be ? should I just install the brushes at angles from each other to create the shape or should they be bent into an hourglass shape ?
Instead of using the SAAB flaps can I get away with short lengths of the brushes to do the same thing at the same angle as the flaps 145 deg off centreline.??
On my car there is a diff oil coole in the centre "wind tunnel" area, is this a good or a bad thing ?
I will be getting a vented bonnet to deal with intercooler airflow so I am not too worried about the undertray affecting the engine/charge temps.
Will there be any cost to aerodynamics by not using archliners ? the kit has flared arches and the liners dont fit anymore.. I could make something for it but only if there will be a gain.
One of the reason I have read about in past for road cars not using aero diffusers is that they have a habit of 'letting go' on a bad surfaced/cambered road. You're in the middle of a corner near the limit but the road has a small change in that screws up the downforce mid bend - off the road you go. The Mac F1 had this problem apparantly. Manufacturers don't like to see the buyers of their vehicles dying in newspaper headlines. Under car aero packages outside of the track can be killers so be very careful adding it to a road car.
this car is a track car, it is road legal but too uncomfortable to go mad in on a road.
I just go to meets in it and do track days.
wearing earplugs in a car is not the most comfy form of motoring...
cheers for the advice though. noted.
/Steve
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
GTR Forum
2.4M posts
69.2K members
Since 2001
A forum community dedicated to Nissan Skyline GTR owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, mods, troubleshooting, body kits, classifieds, maintenance, and more!