Tony,
I doubt V-cam will work with my high lift high duration cams, unless I sink some mine shafts into the pistons, so I'll have to give it a miss.
However, I still maintain that unless the comparison cam (assuming they are the same design), is timed outside of the HKS V-Cam sweep range, the torque and power will be identical for a particular set of revs.
I don't see this on HKS's graphs.
For example, in the comparison in this thread, if the static cam was set to produce peak torque at the 4250RPM range with a vernier wheel (peak torque for V-cam and biggest difference between the two), I don't think that the graphs would look spectacularly different.
As it is, I believe that HKS has set the static cam to a 'way out' of correct position. Looking at the graph, probably at the high rev range, where the advantage would not show due to perhaps the timing of the ex cam coming into effect, or other limited breathing factor associated with high revs. All to make the difference look bigger. That makes me suspicious of how well it actually works.
If HKS designed a variable cam profile switcher, now that would get me interested, and get me to reach a bit deeper into my long pockets, lol.
I know V-Cam does work, just interested to see a proper comparison without the smoke and mirrors.