Thats just plain mean !!!!!
Did you not study maths at school?Hopefully you will have to update again after weekend if I get a run, as a matter of interest if the time was say 10.443 would it go down as a 10.43 or a 10.411 as a 10.3?
" reasons , more traction and I had to get out of the runs in 4th as the car was out of control.the less wheelspin or clutch slip the lower the trap speedok, all done.
Strange that your TV dropped so much. TV is an indicator of power and so I don't see why it is so much lower.
Your 60ft time indicates that your launching technique is greatly improved - which reduces you ET, but I can't understand why you lost so many mph.
So maths would say your stage 4,25 car is around 690/700 whp or 820 hp ??My stage 4.25 car managed 10.2second 1/4mile @136mph on a poor surface. No L/C used.
His terminal speed alone precludes the possibility of that being possible with a stage 4.25 car, either the car is not a stage 4.25 or the ticket is incorrect. It is just not possible to run 10mph faster than the average 4.25 car.Was this at crail what was the 60ft time and 1/8 are time is similiar to mine with 1000bhp as 60ft time poor and I'm 144 terminal so that time is amazing
Apologies, late night mind fart - the exact time was 11.212 1/4mile @ 136.1mph.So maths would say your stage 4,25 car is around 690/700 whp or 820 hp ??
Fastest 4,25 car I have seen running with proper timing equipment is 10.8 @ 127mph. Unless you are running nitrous those times are simply an impossibility