Joined
·
4,586 Posts
I noticed there has been a bit of talk on rod angles of late...
http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/125167-10-6-140mph-i-need-suspension-help-please.html
It is common knowledge that the RB26DETT was spose to be a 2.4lt, and Nissan stroked it to 2.6 at the last minute, So in that the rod angle has been said that it's not ideal.
So...If you stroke the RB26 even further to a 2.8, this will make the rod angle even worse?
The RB30 (and the couple of people that are running RD28 cranks to make a RB29) these are a better angle than the 26 or 28.....But I have read they have higher loads on the big end bearings due to the longer stroke?
What are peoples thoughts on this?
opcorn:
http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/125167-10-6-140mph-i-need-suspension-help-please.html
It is common knowledge that the RB26DETT was spose to be a 2.4lt, and Nissan stroked it to 2.6 at the last minute, So in that the rod angle has been said that it's not ideal.
So...If you stroke the RB26 even further to a 2.8, this will make the rod angle even worse?
The RB30 (and the couple of people that are running RD28 cranks to make a RB29) these are a better angle than the 26 or 28.....But I have read they have higher loads on the big end bearings due to the longer stroke?
What are peoples thoughts on this?