Well, it is fast !, but against this thing it doesn't show . .
Times wouldn't have changed but the result could have been a lot closer. You can win a proper drag race even with a slower time if you can beat the other guy on reaction times... a good driver in an 11.00 second car will beat an inexperienced driver in a 10.5s car everytime.. Pro reaction times can be in the .001sEven if he was asleep, I think it's timed from when the car starts moving.
Before then it's just a crap reaction time isn't it?
Is it really............Well I think the price difference is a lot lot lot bigger than what it seems, how you can even compare the 2 cars is crazy, simply ridiculous.The difference between 10.1 and 10.9 is a lot bigger than what it seems.
Are you going to be at Santa Pod on the 25th March?The difference between 10.1 and 10.9 is a lot bigger than what it seems.
GTR is doing 125mph in 10.9
Veyron is doing 139mph in 10.1
Give the Veyron the same 10.9secs the GTR had and its matching speed would be about 150mph. (125 vs 150) As said, Veyron just comes alive at 150, it is incredible north of that.
Still though, 10.9 from the GTR is not to be sniffed at, very quick car:thumbsup:
I'm sure that will provide the veyron owner with a lot of comfort next time he runs against a stage 2 GTR and has his pants pulled down :runaway:To get a real idea of the Veryon's epic performance you need to do a standing 1/2 mile or, even better, a full mile. After 1/4 mile its barely getting into its stride! The difference in 0-190mph times would be enough to boil an egg!
Yep pretty much!So what we are saying is the Veyron is miles better and justifies it's price (almost) provided it's a very long straight road.
On a track or 1/4 mile etc... it's just a very fancy car but not actually justifying it's price? other than pose value.